What is better for photo editing, Mac or PC It really comes down to what kind of performance you can get from your system.Adobe's Premiere was not released for the Mac for a while but now has been. Lower-end editing software keeps acquiring more and more functionality that. When available, we use affiliate links and may earn a commission!(PC or Mac) for a good photo editing experience. Totally agree with you there, hate having my mouse cursor and the photos app a completely different brightness and color.Download the Free PDF Guide ➡ The ULTIMATE Video Editing Process!It's also a much better deal than Premiere Pro, since in less than a year and a half, you'd spend as much on Adobe's product and still have to keep paying. Furthermore, that 299.99 for Final Cut. ► Final Cut Pro vs Adobe Premiere: Best Video Editor?► Macbook Pro vs Dell XPS for Video EditingMac vs PC for Video Editing: Which is best for you?!Mac vs PC. PC vs Mac… It’s a debate that never ends, and there’s some fierce opposition on both the Windows and MacOS sides! Inevitably, doing a comparison video like this will stoke the flames and draw the hateful wrath of impassioned ‘fanboys’ on both sides of the fence – but we thought what the hey. We get asked ALL the time whether PC or Mac is better for video editing, so why not throw our hat in the ring and help a few people out in the process!I’ve been using both Windows and Mac for a long time now.And you may miss a deadline if your machine can't render the final product quickly enough.This doesn't just apply to PCs. Meanwhile, a subpar monitor or laptop display could yield videos that look shockingly different than what you saw during production. A slow or badly equipped PC, laptop or tablet will be a drag on your creative process. If you do a lot of video or photo editing, the one thing you want to avoid when buying equipment is nasty surprises.
Whats Better For Editing Adobe Or Software Keeps AcquiringSo what do you need to rein in all that power?Storage and memory. The demands of photo and video editingAfter installing a photo or video app, you may find it's by far the most resource-hungry thing on your computer. Here's how to pick gear for photo and video creation, whether you've got $500 or $5,000. Luckily, we've already done a good chunk of the homework for you. Whichever app you choose, it's crucial to do some hardware research to ensure that your equipment will work with the app rather than against it. If you edit videos on Mac or PC, your best bet for speed and flexibility is to use a fast USB 3.1 or Thunderbolt external hard disk or SSD.Acer's Predator Helios 500 gaming laptop with the Intel i9 6-core CPUProcessors and multi-threading. I'd also recommend an SSD program drive, at a minimum, and preferably an NVMe M.2 drive with speeds of 1,500 MB/s or higher. And a lack of storage and a non-SSD program drive will make your PC drag to the point where you'll constantly be deleting, copying and juggling files to get a project finished.Sixteen gigabytes of RAM is really the bare minimum on laptops and desktop PCs for videos and photos, in my opinion, but 24GB or 32GB is ideal. Without enough RAM to handle such files, your computer will slow to a crawl. A single RAW-image file can take up 100 MB, and 4K video files can be multi-gigabyte monsters. Adobe's Lightroom and Photoshop, the two most popular photo-editing packages, benefit little from a GPU you're better off having more RAM and faster storage. When selecting a GPU, it makes a big difference whether you're doing video or photo editing and what kind of display you have. If you want to spend less than four figures, though, you can get AMD's 16-core Ryzen Threadripper 1950X for around $750 ($1,000 less than the 18-core Intel Core i9-7980XE), and you'll take just a 25 percent performance hit.Graphics cards. Professional video or photo editors who want the utmost in performance without regard to price might choose a multi-core Xeon or Core i9 processor. Higher clock speeds boost everything as well, and overclocking, if done safely, can accelerate video- and photo-editing chores just like it does for gaming.When choosing a CPU for a laptop or PC, it's instructive to look at lists like this one from PassMark and compare the ranking (speed) of a chip to its price. Multi-threading can help you finish rendering and other activities more quickly and make switching between applications more seamless. Office version 15191 for macTo get that, you'll need a laptop like the Origin NT-15 Quadro (above) with a much more costly model like NVIDIA's Quadro P4000 or the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100.Monitor. Consumer models from NVIDIA and AMD like the GeForce GTX 1080, new RTX 2080 or Radeon RX Vega 56 don't support OpenGL on Photoshop and other Windows 10 apps, so you won't benefit from the extra colors of a 10-bit display. If you're planning on buying a 10-bit monitor with 1.07 billion colors for Photoshop, be careful which graphics card you select. For video editing, any supported graphics card will help, especially for rendering, but the more you spend, the less you'll have to wait.There's one important caveat to this. If you're running an older or cheaper GPU at 1080p, you could actually see worse performance with the GPU enabled because of the extra overhead. With HDR becoming the norm on consumer TVs, you'll want to strongly consider that as well.The problem is, manufacturers are often not forthcoming about a display's true specs and capabilities. If what you see on the screen doesn't accurately represent your vision, then the public or clients might be disappointed with your work. High resolution and maximum color accuracy are a must. So even if you have a decent budget, this is one area where you might have to compromise. Not surprisingly, you'll pay dearly for them (think $1,400 and up). A cheaper, non-certified HDR monitor will also meet the needs of most video and photo editors.Dell's UltraSharp 27 4K HDR monitor is crazy good but crazy expensiveThere are only a few true, professional 10-bit monitors that hit the magic 1,000-nit mark considered optimal for HDR10 work, including Acer's new ProDesigner BM270 and the Dell UltraSharp 27 4K HDR monitor. An 8-bit monitor that uses frame-rate control (FRC) to simulate more colors will be fine for most creators, and it costs a lot less. (See our guide on how to buy an HDR monitor for more details.) Another issue is setting up HDR on Windows 10, which is a massive pain at this point.That said, you probably don't need to splurge on a super-pricey monitor. Video users will want the 2018 MacBook Pro 15-inch model with discrete AMD graphics, starting at $2,400, while photo editors could spend a bit less and get the $1,800 and up 2018 13-inch, integrated-graphics model. MacBooks are also better designed than most PCs, and Apple offers better support than the lion's share of PC vendors.If you really want a MacBook Pro and are willing to live with some flaws and slower rendering, your best bet might be to either go with the new models or get an older, pre-butterfly-keyboard one. They're still incredibly popular with graphics professionals, because despite the flaws, macOS is simpler and more powerful than Windows 10. They also lack the ports that come standard on PCs. Mac?MacBooks don't have GPUs as fast as you can get on Windows 10 laptops (the 4GB Radeon Pro 560X is the best you can do), and they suffer from embarrassing keyboard problems. Instead, buy a monitor that was set up by the manufacturer to have accurate colors from the factory, like ViewSonic's $900 32-inch VP3268 or the $700 Benq EW3270U. The iMac Pro is even better, of course, with its Radeon Pro graphics and 32GB of RAM, but we're talking about $5,000 and up. If you're in the market for a desktop, on the other hand, an $1,100 iMac will do the job well, preferably if it has discrete AMD graphics and 16GB or more of RAM. Rather, you might be best off buying a used, pre-2015 model with a thicker, more durable keyboard.Another option for photo pros who really want to travel light is the two-pound MacBook, but it's barely powerful enough to run Photoshop or Lightroom CC decently. You'd do pretty well by choosing Dell's XPS Tower Special Edition (8930) PC. Nowadays, though, manufacturers have become more aggressive with desktop-PC pricing, and they have much more purchasing power than you and I.For example, let's say you have a decent budget of $2,000. You could carefully choose each component to maximize the price-to-performance ratio, and they could often beat the price of a similarly configured model from manufacturers like Dell and HP. Desktop PCsI used to believe that the best way to get the maximum power for your money was to build your own PC. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorDaniel ArchivesCategories |